Header image alt text

Economy

Economic Analysis,Researches and Papers

Econometrics

By admin
Filed Under Economics, Uncategorized  | | 1 Comment»

Econometrics has been defined as “the application of mathematics and statistical methods to economic data” and described as the branch of economics “that aims to give empirical content to economic relations.” More precisely, it is “the quantitative analysis of actual economic phenomena based on the concurrent development of theory and observation, related by appropriate methods of inference.” An influential introductory economics textbook describes econometrics as allowing economists “to sift through mountains of data to extract simple relationships.” The first known use of the term “econometrics” (in cognate form) was by Paweł Ciompa in 1910. Ragnar Frisch is credited with coining the term in the sense that it is used today.
Two main purposes of econometrics are to give empirical content to economic theory by formulating economic models in testable form, to estimate those models, and to test them as to acceptance or rejection.
For example, consider one of the basic relationships in economics: the relationship between the price of a commodity and the quantities of that commodity that people wish to purchase at each price (the demand relationship). According to economic theory, an increase in the price would lead to a decrease in the quantity demanded, holding other relevant variables constant so as to isolate the relationship of interest. A mathematical equation can be written that describes the relationship between quantity, price, other demand variables like income, and a random term ε to reflect simplification and imprecision of the theoretical model:

Q = β0 + β1Price + β2Income + ε.

Regression analysis could be used to estimate the unknown parameters β0, β1, and β2 in the relationship, using data on price, income, and quantity. The model could then be tested for statistical significance as to whether an increase in price is associated with a decrease in the quantity, as hypothesized: β1 < 0.

There are complications even in this simple example, and it is often easy to mistake statistical significance with economic significance. Statistical significance is neither necessary nor sufficient for economic significance. In order to estimate the theoretical demand relationship, the observations in the data set must be price and quantity pairs that are collected along a demand schedule that is stable. If those assumptions are not satisfied, a more sophisticated model or econometric method may be necessary to derive reliable estimates and tests.
Theoretical econometrics examines the statistical properties of econometric procedures. Such properties include the power of hypothesis tests and efficiency of estimators and of survey-sampling methods. Applied econometrics uses theoretical econometrics and real-world data for assessing economic theories, developing econometric models, analyzing economic history, and forecasting.

Econometrics may use standard statistical models to study economic questions, but most often they are with observational data, rather than in controlled experiments. In this, the design of observational studies in econometrics is similar to the design of studies in other observational disciplines, such as astronomy, epidemiology, sociology and political science. Analysis of data from an observational study is guided by the study protocol, although exploratory data analysis may by useful for generating new hypotheses.Economics often analyzes systems of equations and inequalities, such as supply and demand hypothesized to be in equilibrium. Consequently, the field of econometrics has developed methods for identification and estimation of simultaneous-equation models. These methods are analogous to methods used in other areas of science, such as the field of system identification in systems analysis and control theory. Such methods may allow researchers to estimate models and investigate their empirical consequences, without directly manipulating the system.

In recent decades, econometricians have increasingly turned to use of experiments to evaluate the often-contradictory conclusions of observational studies. Here, controlled and randomized experiments provide statistical inferences that may yield better empirical performance than do purely observational studies.

One of the fundamental statistical methods used by econometricians is regression analysis. For an overview of a linear implementation of this framework, see linear regression. Regression methods are important in econometrics because economists typically cannot use controlled experiments. Econometricians often seek illuminating natural experiments in the absence of evidence from controlled experiments. Observational data may be subject to omitted-variable bias and a list of other problems that must be addressed using causal analysis of simultaneous-equation models.

Data sets to which econometric analyses are applied can be classified as time-series data, cross-sectional data, panel data, and multidimensional panel data. Time-series data sets contain observations over time; for example, inflation over the course of several years. Cross-sectional data sets contain observations at a single point in time; for example, many individuals’ incomes in a given year. Panel data sets contain both time-series and cross-sectional observations. Multi-dimensional panel data sets contain observations across time, cross-sectionally, and across some third dimension. For example, the Survey of Professional Forecasters contains forecasts for many forecasters (cross-sectional observations), at many points in time (time series observations), and at multiple forecast horizons (a third dimension).

Econometric analysis may also be classified on the basis of the number of relationships modeled. Single-equation methods model a single variable (the dependent variable) as a function of one or more explanatory (or independent) variables. In many econometric contexts, the commonly-used ordinary least squares method may not recover the theoretical relation desired or may produce estimates with poor statistical properties, because the assumptions for valid use of the method are violated. One widely-used remedy is the method of instrumental variables (IV). For an economic model described by more than one equation, simultaneous-equation methods may be used to remedy similar problems, including two IV variants, Two-Stage Least Squares (2SLS), and Three-Stage Least Squares (3SLS).

Other important unifying or distinguishing methods include the Method of Moments, Generalized Method of Moments (GMM), time series analysis, and Bayesian methods.

Computational concerns are important for evaluating econometric methods and for use in decision making. Such concerns include mathematical well-posedness: the existence, uniqueness, and stability of any solutions to econometric equations. Another concern is the numerical efficiency and accuracy of software. A third concern is also the usability of econometric software.

Author: Julian Phillips
Posted:  Friday , 07 Oct 2011

BENONI -

The gold price went over $1,900 and looked as though it was going to mount $2,000, but since then has fallen back to $1,600 and is in the process of consolidating around the lower to mid $1,600 area.   It was expected that it would have moved a lot higher faster, but that hasn’t happened – yet.

In the face of Italy’s downgrade to A2 by the ratings Agency, Moody’s summary that, “There has been a profound loss of confidence in certain European sovereign debt markets, and Moody’s considers that this extremely weak market sentiment will likely persist. It is no longer a temporary problem that might be addressed through liquidity support, and several euro-area governments are increasingly affected by the loss of confidence.” The downgrading was expected, as are further downgrades for the different Eurozone members, so shouldn’t the gold price be on its way through $2,000 to much higher levels?

THE ‘DOWNTURN’

The news over the past few weeks has sent global financial markets down very heavily as a slow recovery morphed into a downturn and at best a flat economic future in the developed world. These falls have been accompanied by tremendous worries that there could be a major banking crisis that will cripple the Eurozone economy as a whole, not just the debt-distressed nations.   In France growth is now at zero, in Greece it is somewhere south of a 5% dip in growth well into recession.   Greater austerity simply adds to the fall in government revenues defeating their purpose of reducing their deficit.   All of this implies an ongoing shrinkage of the Eurozone economy. This hurts investor capacities in all financial markets and wealth throughout the Eurozone.   Cash becomes ‘king’ as investors flee markets to a holding position waiting for much cheaper prices before re-entering at lower levels.

The path to deflation is then made.   Deflation in its early stages causes tremendous de-leveraging. That is the selling of positions to pay off loans taken to increase positions.   It may come about because of investor prudence, banks calling in loans, stop-loss triggers and margin calls [where the level of debt against positions becomes too high and forces sales].   This often and particularly in the case of precious metals has nothing to do with the fundamentals of the market.   It is simply the position of investors.   This happened in the precious metal markets as well.   This is why gold and silver prices fell.

DE-LEVERAGING

As was the case in 2008 and often through history, the process of de-leveraging is a short-lived one, even when it is savage.   Once an investor has sold the positions he feels he needs to, that downward pressure on prices disappears. Leveraged positions are the most vulnerable of investor held positions and can make up the froth or ‘surf’ in the markets, which cause the volatility levels to increase when dramas strike. In 2008 these positions were huge because there had been two and a half decades of burgeoning markets that encouraged greater risk taking.   Since then, while leveraging has taken place it has been less and rapidly removed when dramas hit.

In 2008 we saw a similar drop in the gold price from $1,200 to $1,000 [20%], which equates to the recent fall from $1,910 to $1,590 [16.9%]. In 2008 the precious metal prices then slowly rose as buyers started to come in from all over the world.   It took over a year for prices to recover back to $1,200.

CHANGE IN MARKET STRUCTURE

Today the shape of the precious metal markets is quite different, particularly that of gold. In 2008 central banks were sellers, today they are buyers. In 2008 the Chinese gold markets were small.   Since then they have grown to such an extent that they are soon to overtake India.   These are two dynamic features that give demand a totally different shape to 2008. More than that, the impact of the developed world long-term has diminished quite considerably.   It now represents less than 21% of jewelry, bar and coin demand.   The emerging world as a whole represents over 70% of such demand now.

The bulk of the world’s physical gold that comes to the market is dealt at the London twice daily Fixings.   The balance that is traded outside the Fixings is the most short-term price influential amounts, producing the swings that resemble the waves on the seashore. It is these traders and speculators that often persuade long-term buyers to stand back and wait for the prices to swing to the point that persuades them to enter the market. The drop from $1,900 had this effect on investors. Now that the fall has happened we see a surge in demand from the emerging world to pick up the slack in the market.   We have no doubt that central banks are buying the dips as well.

So once the selling from the developed world has stopped [emerging market demand waits for this before buying, allowing the fall to extend further] in come the buyers happy that they are entering the market at a good time. Because of this change in market shape we fully expect the market to take far less time to find its balance and allow demand to dominate.

2012 RECESSION AND THE BATTLE AGAINST IT

The IMF has just warned that the developed world will enter a recession in 2012.   Will that be a negative for the gold market?   We do not believe that it will.   The world has seen the recovery peter out, has seen the sovereign debt crisis arrive and now sees the IMF recommend that the Eurozone banks be recapitalized.   What does this mean for precious metals?

Cast you minds back to the recapitalization of U.S. banks under the TARP measures whereby the Fed bought the ‘toxic’ debt investments of the banks against fresh money. When we say fresh we mean just that, newly created money in the trillions. This did lower the perceived value of the dollar inside and outside the U.S.   The effect on gold was palpable as it rose back through $1,200 and on to new highs.

Already we are hearing rumors of an EU government minister’s plan to walk the same or similar road. With the recent past in mind, we are certain that that will lower the perceived value of the euro and see euro investors seek places to cling onto the value the euro still has. This time round we fully expect markets to discount these actions in the same way.   The downturn will therefore be fought with new money creation in the same way the US. did it from 2008 on.

SECOND TIME ROUND

There is a significant difference between 2008 and now.   In 2008 the credit crunch was new to investors and shocked the markets into overreactions.   In 2011 we are not shocked but expectant of what lies ahead.   In 2008 the developed world economy had considerably more resilience than it does now, so the situation is more serious and less likely to be believed as the panacea for the developed world’s economic crisis.   Because gold and silver prices rose so strongly after that time and in the face of those ‘solutions’ the same will be expected now.   In 2008 confidence in the financial system as well as in the monetary system appeared unassailable, not this time.   While the developed world, outside of the gold ETFs in the U.S., has not been the main driver of rising gold prices, this time we would not be surprised to see their resilient confidence in their world snap and a frantic search for safe-havens follow.

Yes, if we see a repeat of the 2008 breakdowns in the near future they will slaughter remaining confidence in the monetary system and the ability of governments to set matters straight.   The results for gold and silver prices could be very significant.

Julian Phillips is a longstanding, and well-respected, gold and silver analyst and principal contributor to www.goldforecaster.com and www.silverforecaster.com

THE price of oil has had an unnerving ability to blow up the world economy, and the Middle East has often provided the spark. The Arab oil embargo of 1973, the Iranian revolution in 1978-79 and Saddam Hussein’s invasion of Kuwait in 1990 are all painful reminders of how the region’s combustible mix of geopolitics and geology can wreak havoc. With protests cascading across Arabia, is the world in for another oil shock? There are good reasons to worry. The Middle East and north Africa produce more than one-third of the world’s oil. Libya’s turmoil shows that a revolution can quickly disrupt oil supply. Even while Muammar Qaddafi hangs on with delusional determination and Western countries debate whether to enforce a no-fly zone (see article), Libya’s oil output has halved, as foreign workers flee and the country fragments. The spread of unrest across the region threatens wider disruption. The markets’ reaction has been surprisingly modest. The price of Brent crude jumped 15% as Libya’s violence flared up, reaching $120 a barrel on February 24th. But the promise of more production from Saudi Arabia pushed the price down again. It was $116 on March 2nd—20% higher than the beginning of the year, but well below the peaks of 2008. Most economists are sanguine: global growth might slow by a few tenths of a percentage point, they reckon, but not enough to jeopardise the rich world’s recovery. In this section »The 2011 oil shock Don’t let him linger Tata sauce A rival for the president Second life Home truths Reprints Related items Oil markets and Arab unrest: The price of fearMar 3rd 2011 The Libyan conundrum: Don’t let him lingerMar 3rd 2011 Saudi Arabia: The royal house is rattled tooMar 3rd 2011 India’s economy: Calling on the godsMar 3rd 2011 Related topics Europe Saudi Arabia Libya Middle East EU economy That glosses over two big risks. First, a serious supply disruption, or even the fear of it, could send the oil price soaring (see article). Second, dearer oil could fuel inflation—and that might prompt a monetary clampdown that throttles the recovery. A lot will depend on the skill of central bankers. Of stocks, Saudis and stability So far, the shocks to supply have been tiny. Libya’s turmoil has reduced global oil output by a mere 1%. In 1973 the figure was around 7.5%. Today’s oil market also has plenty of buffers. Governments have stockpiles, which they didn’t in 1973. Commercial oil stocks are more ample than they were when prices peaked in 2008. Saudi Arabia, the central bank of the oil market, technically has enough spare capacity to replace Libya, Algeria and a clutch of other small producers. And the Saudis have made clear that they are willing to pump. Yet more disruption cannot be ruled out. The oil industry is extremely complex: getting the right sort of oil to the right place at the right time is crucial. And then there is Saudi Arabia itself (see article). The kingdom has many of the characteristics that have fuelled unrest elsewhere, including an army of disillusioned youths. Despite spending $36 billion so far buying off dissent, a repressive regime faces demands for reform. A whiff of instability would spread panic in the oil market. Even without a disruption to supply, prices are under pressure from a second source: the gradual dwindling of spare capacity. With the world economy growing strongly, oil demand is far outpacing increases in readily available supply. So any jitters from the Middle East will accelerate and exaggerate a price rise that was already on the way. What effect would that have? It is some comfort that the world economy is less vulnerable to damage from higher oil prices than it was in the 1970s. Global output is less oil-intensive. Inflation is lower and wages are much less likely to follow energy-induced price rises, so central banks need not respond as forcefully. But less vulnerable does not mean immune. Dearer oil still implies a transfer from oil consumers to oil producers, and since the latter tend to save more it spells a drop in global demand. A rule of thumb is that a 10% increase in the price of oil will cut a quarter of a percentage point off global growth. With the world economy currently growing at 4.5%, that suggests the oil price would need to leap, probably above its 2008 peak of almost $150 a barrel, to fell the recovery. But even a smaller increase would sap growth and raise inflation. Shocked into action In the United States the Federal Reserve will face a relatively easy choice. America’s economy is needlessly vulnerable, thanks to its addiction to oil (and light taxation of it). Yet inflation is extremely low and the economy has plenty of slack. This gives its central bank the latitude to ignore a sudden jump in the oil price. In Europe, where fuel is taxed more heavily, the immediate effect of dearer oil is smaller. But Europe’s central bankers are already more worried about rising prices: hence the fear that they could take pre-emptive action too far, and push Europe’s still-fragile economies back into recession. By contrast, the biggest risk in the emerging world is inaction. Dearer oil will stoke inflation, especially through higher food prices—and food still accounts for a large part of people’s spending in countries like China, Brazil and India. True, central banks have been raising interest rates, but they have tended to be tardy. Monetary conditions are still too loose, and inflation expectations have risen. Unfortunately, too many governments in emerging markets have tried to quell inflation and reduce popular anger by subsidising the prices of both food and fuel. Not only does this dull consumers’ sensitivity to rising prices, it could be expensive for the governments concerned. It will stretch India’s optimistic new budget (see article). But the biggest danger lies in the Middle East itself, where subsidies of food and fuel are omnipresent and where politicians are increasing them to quell unrest. Fuel importers, such as Egypt, face a vicious, bankrupting, spiral of higher oil prices and ever bigger subsidies. The answer is to ditch such subsidies and aim help at the poorest, but no Arab ruler is likely to propose such reforms right now. At its worst, the danger is circular, with dearer oil and political uncertainty feeding each other. Even if that is avoided, the short-term prospects for the world economy are shakier than many realise. But there could be a silver lining: the rest of the world could at long last deal with its vulnerability to oil and the Middle East. The to-do list is well-known, from investing in the infrastructure for electric vehicles to pricing carbon. The 1970s oil shocks transformed the world economy. Perhaps a 2011 oil shock will do the same—at less cost.

http://www.economist.com/node/18281774

International economics

By admin
Filed Under Economics  | | 3 Comments»

International trade studies determinants of goods-and-services flows across international boundaries. It also concerns the size and distribution of Gains from trade. Policy applications include estimating the effects of changing Tariff rates and trade quotas. International finance is a macroeconomic field which examines the flow of Capital (economics) across international borders, and the effects of these movements on Exchange rate. Increased trade in goods, services and capital between countries is a major effect of contemporary Globalization World map showing List of countries by GDP (PPP) per capita.

The distinct field of Development economics examines economic aspects of the development process in relatively Developing countries low-income countries focusing on Structural change, Poverty, and Economic growth. Approaches in development economics frequently incorporate social and political factors.

Economic systems is the classification codes of economics that studies the methods and Institutions by which societies determine the ownership, direction, and allocation of economic resources. An economic system of a society is the unit of analysis.

Among contemporary systems at different ends of the organizational spectrum are Planned economy and Capitalism, in which most production occurs in respectively state-run and private enterprises. In between are Mixed economies. A common element is the interaction of economic and political influences, broadly described as Political economy. Comparative economic systems studies the relative performance and behavior of different economies or systems.

Stanford University Department of Economics University of California-Berkeley Department of EconomicsHarvard University Department of EconomicsUniversity of Pennsylvania Department of EconomicsUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison Department of EconomicsMassachusetts Inst of Technology Department of EconomicsNorthwestern University Department of EconomicsUniversity of Minnesota Department of EconomicsCornell University Department of EconomicsUniversity of California-San Diego Department of EconomicsUniversity of Michigan Department of EconomicsUniversity of Chicago Department of EconomicsYale University Department of EconomicsUniversity of Rochester Department of EconomicsUniversity of Iowa Department of EconomicsUniversity of California-Los Angeles Department of EconomicsPrinceton University Department of EconomicsCalifornia Institute Technology Department of Economics Boston University Department of EconomicsU of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Department of Economics

click here for full list.

 

In this section, we discuss a few key economic concepts; then we incorporate knowledge of these concepts into a definition of economics.

Goods and Bads

Economists talk about goods and bads. A good is anything that gives a person utility or satisfaction. Here is a partial list of some goods: a computer, a car, a watch, a television set, friendship, and love. You will notice from our list that a good can be either tangible or intangible. A computer is a tangible good; friendship is an intangible good. Simply put, for something to be a good (whether tangible or intangible), it simply has to give you utility or satisfaction.

A bad is something that gives a person disutility or dissatisfaction. If the flu gives you

disutility or dissatisfaction, then it is a bad. If the constant nagging of an acquaintance is

something that gives you disutility or dissatisfaction, then it is a bad.

People want goods and they do not want bads. In fact, they will pay to get goods

(“Here is $1,000 for the computer”), and they will pay to get rid of bads they currently

have (“I’d be willing to pay you, doctor, if you can prescribe something that will shorten

the time I have the flu”).

Can something be a good for one person and a bad for another person? Well, because

a good is something that gives one utility and a bad is something that gives one  disutility,

this question is simply asking whether something can give utility to one person and

disutility to another. Can you identify such a thing? What about cigarette smoking? For

some people, smoking cigarettes gives them utility; for other people, it gives them disutility.

We conclude that smoking cigarettes can be a good for some people and a bad for

others. This must be why the wife tells her husband, “If you want to smoke, you should

do it outside.” In other words, get those bads away from me.

Resources

Goods do not just appear before us when we snap our fingers. It takes resources to produce goods. (Sometimes resources are referred to as inputs or factors of production.)

Generally, economists divide resources into four broad categories: land, labor, capital,

and entrepreneurship. Land includes natural resources, such as minerals, forests, water, and unimproved land. For example, oil, wood, and animals fall into this category. (Sometimes economists refer to this category simply as natural resources.)

Labor consists of the physical and mental talents people contribute to the production

process. For example, a person building a house is using his or her own labor.

Capital consists of produced goods that can be used as inputs for further production.

Factories, machinery, tools, computers, and buildings are examples of capital. One country might have more capital than another. This means that it has more factories, machinery, tools, and so on.

Entrepreneurship refers to the particular talent that some people have for organizing

the resources of land, labor, and capital to produce goods, seek new business opportunities, and develop new ways of doing things.

Scarcity and a Definition of Economics

We are now ready to define a key concept in economics: scarcity. Scarcity is the condition in which our wants (for goods) are greater than the limited resources (land, labor, capital, and entrepreneurship) available to satisfy those wants. In other words, we want goods, but there are just not enough resources available to provide us with all the goods we want.

Look at it this way: Our wants (for goods) are infinite, but our resources (which we need to produce the goods) are finite. Scarcity is our infinite wants hitting up against finite resources.

Many economists say that if scarcity didn’t exist, neither would economics. In other

words, if our wants weren’t greater than the limited resources available to satisfy them,

there would be no field of study called economics. This is similar to saying that if matter

and motion didn’t exist, neither would physics or that if living things didn’t exist, neither

would biology. For this reason, we define economics in this text as the science of scarcity. More completely, economics is the science of how individuals and societies deal with the fact that wants are greater than the limited resources available to satisfy those wants.

 

Macroeconomics

By admin
Filed Under Macroeconomics  | | No Comments»

 

Macroeconomics (from Greek prefix “macr(o)-” meaning “large” + “economics”) is a branch of economics dealing with the performance, structure, behavior, and decision-making of the entire economy. This includes a national, regional, or global economy.[1][2] With microeconomics, macroeconomics is one of the two most general fields in economics.

Macroeconomists study aggregated indicators such as GDP, unemployment rates, and price indices to understand how the whole economy functions. Macroeconomists develop models that explain the relationship between such factors as national income, output, consumption, unemployment, inflation, savings, investment, international trade and international finance. In contrast, microeconomics is primarily focused on the actions of individual agents, such as firms and consumers, and how their behavior determines prices and quantities in specific markets.

While macroeconomics is a broad field of study, there are two areas of research that are emblematic of the discipline: the attempt to understand the causes and consequences of short-run fluctuations in national income (the business cycle), and the attempt to understand the determinants of long-run economic growth (increases in national income).

Macroeconomic models and their forecasts are used by both governments and large corporations to assist in the development and evaluation of economic policy and business strategy.

 

Managerial economics (sometimes referred to as business economics) is a branch of economics that applies microeconomic analysis to decision methods of businesses or other management units. As such, it bridges economic theory and economics in practice. It draws heavily from quantitative techniques such as regression analysis and correlation, Lagrangian calculus (linear). If there is a unifying theme that runs through most of managerial economics it is the attempt to optimize business decisions given the firm’s objectives and given constraints imposed by scarcity, for example through the use of operations research and programming.
managerial decision areas
• production
• reduction and control of cost
• make or buy decision
• inventory decision
• investment decision
Almost any business decision can be analyzed with managerial economics techniques, but it is most commonly applied to:
• Risk analysis – various models are used to quantify risk and asymmetric information and to employ them in decision rules to manage risk.
• Production analysis – microeconomic techniques are used to analyze production efficiency, optimum factor allocation, costs, economies of scale and to estimate the firm’s cost function.
• Pricing analysis – microeconomic techniques are used to analyze various pricing decisions including transfer pricing, joint product pricing, price discrimination, price elasticity estimations, and choosing the optimum pricing method.
• Capital budgeting – Investment theory is used to examine a firm’s capital purchasing decisions.
At universities, the subject is taught primarily to advanced undergraduates and graduate business schools. It is approached as an integration subject. That is, it integrates many concepts from a wide variety of prerequisite courses. In many countries it is possible to read for a degree in Business Economics which often covers managerial economics, financial economics, game theory, business forecasting and industrial economics.

Master of Economics

By admin
Filed Under Economics  | | No Comments»

Master of Economics From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search A Master’s Degree in Economics (M.Econ.; also MS in Economics, MA in Economics is a postgraduate academic program, offering training in economic theory, econometrics and / or applied economics. The degree may be offered as a terminal degree or as additional preparation for doctoral study, and is sometimes offered as a professional degree. The program emphasis and curriculum will differ correspondingly. Many universities (in the US) do not offer the Master’s degree directly, rather the degree is routinely awarded as a Master’s degree “en route”, after completion of a designated phase of the Ph.D. in economics. The course lasts from one to six years correspondingly. A thesis is generally required, particularly for terminal degrees. Typically, the curriculum is structured around core topics, with any optional coursework complementary to the program focus. The core modules are usually in Microeconomic Theory, Macroeconomic Theory and Econometrics. Theory focused degrees will tend to cover these more mathematically, and emphasize econometric theory as opposed to econometric techniques and software; these will also require a separate course in Mathematical economics. Note though that regardless of focus, most programs “now place a marked emphasis on the primacy of mathematics”, and many universities thus also require “quantitative techniques”, especially where mathematical economics is not a core course. The optional or additional coursework will depend on the program’s emphasis. In theory focused degrees, and those preparing students for doctoral work, this coursework is often in these same core topics, but in greater depth. In terminal or applied or career focused degrees, options may include public finance, labour-, financial-, development-, industrial-, health- or agricultural economics. These degrees may also allow for a specialization in one of these areas, and may be named correspondingly (for example Master of Financial Economics, Masters in International Economics, Masters in Development Economics, Masters in Agricultural Economics). Entry requirements are undergraduate work in economics, at least at the intermediate level, and usually as a major, and a sufficient level of mathematical training (including courses in: probability / statistics; often (multivariable) calculus and linear algebra; sometimes mathematical analysis .

In economics, the Dutch disease is a concept that purportedly explains the apparent relationship between the increase in exploitation of natural resources and a decline in the manufacturing sector. The claimed mechanism is that an increase in revenues from natural resources (or inflows of foreign aid) will make a given nation’s currency stronger compared to that of other nations (manifest in an exchange rate), resulting in the nation’s other exports becoming more expensive for other countries to buy, making the manufacturing sector less competitive. While it most often refers to natural resource discovery, it can also refer to “any development that results in a large inflow of foreign currency, including a sharp surge in natural resource prices, foreign assistance, and foreign direct investment”.The term was coined in 1977 by The Economist to describe the decline of the manufacturing sector in the Netherlands after the discovery of a large natural gas field in 1959.
There are many researches about dutch disease such as:

http://are.berkeley.edu/courses/envres_seminar/f2002/Stijns02.pdf

be continued…